LoriWeber2YN

meta

Bitcoin is very hard to change, a property that is critical to it having any value at all. But, what exactly prevents it from being changed? Bitcoin is also bigger than ever, so how do improvements get made?

Announcing the open source bitcoin consensus analysis project (BCAP).

Earlier this year, @avichal and I discussed the potential for such a project, and over the past few months, I have been working with @0xren_cf and @LynAldenContact to go from concept to a solid starting point, which can now be found at the link below

https://github.com/bitcoin-cap/bcap

Bitcoin consensus is simply a set of rules codified in software. However, what maintains that consensus and what allows that consensus to change is extremely complex. What roles do each of us play in this consensus? What motivations and powers do each of us have?

This project identifies 6 stakeholder groups that play a role in bitcoin consensus including each group's motivation and powers. It also analyzes how each group’s power shifts over the lifecycle of potential change. https://github.com/bitcoin-cap/bcap#stakeholders

Ultimately, investors have the most power, but their power is often exercised late in the lifecycle of change when bitcoin might be on the brink during a contentious fork. Ideally, we avoid winding up in such a fragile state, so the project explores this dynamic.

The Bitcoin Core project is just one implementation of the bitcoin protocol, but it wields tremendous power given it is the software run by a near-majority of the bitcoin network. It has earned this position by prioritizing security and being conservative on protocol changes.

Historically, changes to bitcoin consensus have been proposed by Bitcoin Core developers and have all been merged into the Bitcoin Core project. Recently, there has been a shift to non-Core developers proposing changes. It is unclear whether this impacts Core prioritizing these.

Often people claim that Bitcoin Core has too much power as a few devs can “change bitcoin.” While this is clearly untrue, the opposite is true in that there is veto-like power to prevent changes.

Thus, alternative consensus clients are an important option. However, they are for extreme situations as it would be very difficult to gain widespread adoption. Low adoption can lead to a fragile network.

The project explores one such scenario in which a change is (partially) activated with miner hash rate but low adoption from nodes. This can lead to a sizable bounty forming tempting miners to create a chain split, and leaving bitcoin in a state of chaos. (let’s avoid this)

If a trading market develops between fork A and fork B, investors determine the value, but it turns out not all investors are equal. Self-custody individual investors have advantages over corporate and institutional investor segments.

There are many other future scenarios, and we’d love to see the project evolve to analyze these as it is intended to be a community project that serves bitcoin well into the future. The project is off to a great start with 2 dozen reviewers spanning all 6 stakeholder groups.

If anyone sees ways to improve this project please file an issue https://github.com/bitcoin-cap/bcap/issues, open a PR https://github.com/bitcoin-cap/bcap/pulls, or begin a discussion https://github.com/bitcoin-cap/bcap/discussions.

There is a PDF version in case that is easier to read or to share with others. https://github.com/bitcoin-cap/bcap/blob/main/bcap_v1.0.pdf

Bitcoin Consensus Analysis Project

Stacker_Sports

How the Bank Term Funding Program Enables Sneaky Backdoor Quantitative Easing

GregoryLaraL3L

That's a good point. Energy is quite volatile and has a ripple effect through the economy

BooksAndArticles

BIP324 integration by sipa (merged)

bitcoin

How to crack encrypted SSH keys with John the Ripper

CurtisGreerVCE

The number of possible combinations for a 24-word Bitcoin seed phrase is  2048^24, which is an incredibly large number far greater than the estimated number of atoms in the observable universe. That's a fun fact for me. But even funnier fact is also that someone has probably tried to randomly guess a wallet 😃

builders

Paxful suspends Marketplace

JeanSweeneyP0F

Yeah, that's what really got me into bitcoin. I'm not sure it is all that common of an emotion. It comes from deeper understanding of both how screwed up the world is as well as how bitcoin works and how it could make a dent in many problems. I've spent so much of my life digging into trying to understand and mostly the more I learn the more dark the world looks. Before bitcoin my faith is really the only thing that has kept me from despair for the future. Bitcoin is very hopeful.

REXEARCH : Virtual Size of Onchain Transaction

BryanCarlsonMJX

It's kind of rude to ask questions about a feature that doesn't exist yet, but I'm curious what the sub-board design will look like, the assumptions underlying it, and the features it will include to support the design goals.

For instance: you can imagine that sub-boards could be administered by a moderator; and then the mod gets to say "these are the rules to be here" a la Reddit.  But what if the sub is about a contentious topic (e.g., religion, politics, the block subsidy) and douchebags show up to the sub trying to DDOS everything with asshole comments from multiple accounts, etc?

Then I thought: what if a sub could have an "ante" where you have to ante up some number of sats if you want to post, and the ante is timelocked so once you ante, you can't withdraw for a while.  The sats are held in reserve in a sub-sub-wallet (ha!).  If the user is an asshole, the mod can sweep the funds into the SN rewards pool.  

Obviously you can imagine ways the mod can abuse this; but you can also see how market incentives provide strong abuse counter-incentives: a smart mod would be judicious about funds-sweeping, and would make a case for why she was proposing to sweep.  If the sub got a bad rep, people would stop anteing up and the sub would quickly die.  But there would be a public record of the action, and the user's actions pre-sweep, so people could decide for themselves.

Like the SN version of free-banking.  Market in action.  Only possible using btc / LN.