pull down to refresh

Bob Murphy had the best Austrian response to that Austrian hang up. Basically, he pointed out that it was moot to argue that Bitcoin violated the Regression Theorem, because the Regression Theorem is about how things become a medium of exchange and Bitcoin is already a medium of exchange.
What so many Austrians missed, is that the commodity value can originally be novelty, as was the case when buying those first two pizzas. Once that happened, the process of price formation was set in motion. It's incredibly ironic that Austrians missed that, since their whole thing is being dedicated to subjective utility theory.
I would also like pinned comments for posts... but I'm expanding scope. I should open a feature request.
https://mullvad.net any day no need to setup a account just a random number.
Also uses RAM servers.
You can also use bitcoin to pay!
Beautiful analysis, well-articulated. The sense of what it means to be a 'custodian' is going to permute in a million ways, using all the entities you listed already, and more that will be invented. The gradient of custodianship and sovereignty will be broad and complicated. There's no other way, and thinking it through is useful.