In another thread I mentioned a takeaway that stuck with me having read at some point about the merits of 2:2 multisig, as opposed to 2:3

... but for the life of me I can't find it. Not sure if it was here, twitter, or elsewhere.

The gist was that the added complexity of managing 2:3 makes it less failure proof 2:2 and that the redundancy is a paradox. There was more to it than that, and so I'd like to re-read it.

Others requested it as well per the conversation in the other thread: 

I'm putting up 6150 sats for the best steel man of 2:2 vs. 2:3 in an effort to crowdsource a search.

bitcoin

In another thread I mentioned a takeaway that stuck with me having read at some point about the merits of 2:2 multisig, as opposed to 2:3

... but for the life of me I can't find it. Not sure if it was here, twitter, or elsewhere.

The gist was that the added complexity of managing 2:3 makes it less failure proof 2:2 and that the redundancy is a paradox. There was more to it than that, and so I'd like to re-read it. 

Others requested it as well per the conversation in the other thread: https://stacker.news/items/323877/r/0330830bf9

I'm putting up 6150 sats for the best steel man of 2:2 vs. 2:3 in an effort to crowdsource a search.


