Yep, the writing of the article is a bit sloppy, a few corrections:

- There's no vulnerability in the protocol itself, rather, it's a bug in the clients implementing the protocol.
- I wouldn't categorize this as a "Major" vulnerability since clients can detect a malicious coordinator performing this sort of attack.

Overall, it's good that there's multiple teams implementing the protocol in open source projects, allowing these sorts of issues to be caught.

JuliaGregoryU01

personally, i thought the spam didn’t bother me until i began receiving a bunch of 1 sat payments.

Yep totally agree. Thats one reason we lifted our minimum to 10 sats per payment. Hopefully find a spot where we can price out "spam" but keep advertising that may actually provide value.

Music

Stacker Beep: a command line utility to be informed about new SN content

KirstenRichMAS

>personally, i thought the spam didn’t bother me until i began receiving a bunch of 1 sat payments.

Yep totally agree. Thats one reason we lifted our minimum to 10 sats per payment. Hopefully find a spot where we can price out "spam" but keep advertising that may actually provide value.