pull down to refresh

Is there even an argument that nostr does scale? I haven't had the time to examine it as closely as I should. But my understanding is there's no mechanism to spread the load on popular relays; even simple things like avoiding DoS attacks aren't clear yet beyond "paid relays". Which of course, isn't a very decentralized way of moving data around.

At small scale these problems are probably not a big deal as lots of people can step in to run new relays. But at Twitter scale, if big relays went down it'd take quite a lot for someone else to take up the slack and for users to switch over.

Thess purity tests are ridiculous. LND is open source. Bitcoin is an open source movement. LND is not developing closed source software and umbrel and mynode need to kick license fees to run the software on their node in a box.

I am glad you are taking the deeper dive and running another implementation of lightning but the reasoning is misguided. Please remember bitcoins hashing function is created by the NSA. Which it doesn’t get more statist that that. Yet we all use it without reserve.

reply