If he ever returns, I will assume he has been compromised and is working as an agent of the government.

1. Core's plan was always to roll out 80 byte OP_RETURN incrementally by starting with 40 to see if it broke anything and then ramping shortly up to the intended 80.

2. #Bitcoin Core, having finished that project, has had 80 byte OP_RETURN for nearly a decade now. 85%+ miners have been set to 80 bytes for the same amount of time. Read the commit log. Read the bitcoin-dev mailing list.

3. Luke admitted on Shitter/X that he only went along with the Core team because he had his own fork where he would make up his own standard.

4. Now that Jack has invested in Luke to decentralize mining, he's cast a shadow over the Ocean.xyz launch by hijacking the conversation and torpedoing their marketing to serve his own vendetta against the Core team.

5. Whirlpool transactions are trivial to detect and Luke could whitelist them no problem. Instead we get gaslighting about decentralization and freedom while Luke kneecaps #Bitcoin fungibility.

6. What's more centralized? The development process in bitcoin:master with a decade+ track record, ~1000 developers, and 20,000+ code reviews, or Knots, where one dude makes god commits daily, breaking critical aspects of #Bitcoin?

7. Until Ocean.xyz launches #StratumV2, it's just another gatekeeper. Ordinals is going to run out of customers like every other shitcoin. We don't need to compromise Core just because Luke didn't get his way 10 years ago.

8. GFY.

JoannHernandezJI6

the transaction hash is customized to have the tx author's twitter handle and a bunch of leading zeroes

This part is incorrect :) I only learned about this transaction from mononauts tweet. While I did create 

 a while ago, I'm not related to this transaction. I obviously can't prove it..

Linux

On Bitcoin "Scaling" and the need for "Changes"

RayLandryJPA

> the transaction hash is customized to have the tx author's twitter handle and a bunch of leading zeroes

This part is incorrect :) I only learned about this transaction from mononauts tweet. While I did create [`b10c007c60e14f9d087e0291d4d0c7869697c6681d979c6639dbd960792b4d41`](https://b10c.me/blog/007-spending-p2tr-pre-activation/#spending-p2tr-outputs-before-activation) a while ago, I'm not related to this transaction. I obviously can't prove it..