pull down to refresh
reply
I don't know, but it sounds... Possible. 🌞
I've noticed (also in my family) that women often times say / propose something, only to instantly scan the expressions of the people around, after which they either back paddle- or expand on their initial stance.
To me, it bears a resemblance to the idea you're proposing in your post:
- A woman's "plan of action" only goes as far as the wants, of the community; if the proposal is unpopular, it's scrapped, no matter if she'd have been right in the end.
In contrast, a man might (with the assistance of the minority) simply knuckle his proposal through, no matter the general consensus.
Something along those lines, ain't it?
Interesting, interesting. I hope that you post about your other thoughts as well, I'd gladly read them. 🤠🔥⚡
Edit: Props on the formatting, I've gotta get on your level!
reply
I still want to make more improvements to the
rolesimplementations.Right now they are just PoCs that demo how the low-level APIs can be used. But I want to eventually put them into a shape where they could be used as high-level API for custom implementations of roles (e.g.: pools, proxies and JDs).