pull down to refresh
Day 374 of snailposting everyday 'til BTC hits $100k.
__@_'-'
Did the nostr waitlist earlier in the week along with some repo management and automation for all mutiny code. Rest of the week is going to work on an LSP.
This is an awesome solution @k00b! Thank you so much for your continued work!
I'm so bullish on stacker.news.
When you create a new software wallet, you get this screen:
https://i.postimg.cc/jqHB0nn6/2023-10-26-040739-649x692-scrot.png
You can choose to add a passphrase.
Using a passphrase should be the same as hidden wallets since any password will open a valid wallet:
https://i.postimg.cc/FFVCntwD/2023-10-26-040812-699x151-scrot.png
This is something different from using a password to encrypt your wallet which you can also do with Sparrow.
Suppose Antpool has demonstrated a pattern of mining on the competing fork (as opposed to mining on their own block during a fork).
As you explained, if Antpool were trying to maximize profits (short term) then they would mine on their own block during a chainsplit.
What are you opinions on the following reasons why Antpool would abandon their own block during a fork?
- Antpool does not want to be "liable" for a 2+ block chainsplit that could appear as an attempt to reorg blocks (its a way to guard reputation as an "honest" pool)
- Antpool is using the Tit for Tat Strategy (its a long-term strategy of mutual cooperation)
Do you have a theory why a pool would mine on the competing fork?
Because I want to be able to tell any bank to fuck off while avoiding become a financial hobo.